While supporters claim the bill will improve animal welfare, HB 5137 would eliminate responsible and regulated avenues for obtaining companion parrots without addressing the root causes of neglect or irresponsible ownership.

This legislation would:

  • Reduce consumer choice and access to companion birds
  • Drive pet birds and bird owners into the black market, where legal protections are fewer and birds are mistreated

Parrots are unique, long-lived companion animals that require knowledgeable owners and responsible placement practices. Massachusetts should focus on enforcing animal welfare laws and holding bad actors accountable, not imposing a prohibition on pet parrots at pet shops. 

Tell your legislators to vote NO on HB 5137 and support policies that promote responsible ownership, animal welfare, and accountability.

What Are Pet Bans?

Pet bans don’t ban pets outright, but they make it harder to get one. Typically, these laws ban stores from selling dogs, cats, and rabbits. Increasingly, these laws ban guinea pigs and other pets, too. A recent law in D.C. bans the sale of mammals, reptiles, amphibians, and birds. 

Advocates claim these laws help pets, but it’s the opposite: They actually hurt pets.

Here’s how these laws hurt pets:

Better Solutions

People are rightly seeking to ensure the welfare of animals sold through stores. The way to do this is to address animal welfare directly. Banning stores from selling animals only creates a black market where there is less protection for animals. After all, Prohibition didn’t stop moonshiners–it helped them. 

Effective solutions include:

Ready To Help?

Tell your legislators to oppose pet bans!