Senate Bill 3028 and House Bill 967 would ban the sale of cats and dogs at licensed pet stores. This would make it more difficult for people to obtain these pets from this humane and regulated source, driving them to look for pets on TikTok, Craiglist, or other online marketplaces–where there are fewer consumer and animal protections. 

These bills will hurt pets and people, not help them, by:

  • Creating a black market for pets that can include abuse and trafficking
  • Causing families to become victims to internet scams
  • Removing a transparent and highly regulated source of pets

The best policy for pets is to ensure all pets are treated well – not make them harder to legally obtain. S. 3028 and H. 967 misses the mark and fails to address the real issue of animal cruelty and irresponsible animal breeding. Sign your name to tell your state legislators to vote no on S. 3028 and consider more effective policies instead.

What Are Pet Bans?

Pet bans don’t ban pets outright, but they make it harder to get one. Typically, these laws ban stores from selling dogs, cats, and rabbits. Increasingly, these laws ban guinea pigs and other pets, too. A recent law in D.C. bans the sale of mammals, reptiles, amphibians, and birds. 

Advocates claim these laws help pets, but it’s the opposite: They actually hurt pets.

Here’s how these laws hurt pets:

Better Solutions

People are rightly seeking to ensure the welfare of animals sold through stores. The way to do this is to address animal welfare directly. Banning stores from selling animals only creates a black market where there is less protection for animals. After all, Prohibition didn’t stop moonshiners–it helped them. 

Effective solutions include:

Ready To Help?

Tell your legislators to oppose pet bans!