Animal rights activists are increasing pressure on local governments across California to ban all pet sales at licensed pet stores. Oakland could be the next target.

These bans would include fish, birds, reptiles, and small mammals.

Similar restrictions in other jurisdictions have driven consumers toward less regulated sources, including online marketplaces and out-of-state sellers where transparency and oversight are limited. Pet sale bans will also cause wildlife trafficking to supply the pet “black market” if local businesses are banned from selling pets. 

Responsible pet retailers provide consumers with a responsible option to get a pet and play an important role in education and animal care. They are also regulated and inspected by the state. 

Oakland should prioritize practical policies that support responsible pet ownership and reject policies that diminish the human-animal bond. 

Take Action Today

Contact Oakland officials and urge them to oppose efforts to restrict responsible retail pet sales.

What Are Pet Bans?

Pet bans don’t ban pets outright, but they make it harder to get one. Typically, these laws ban stores from selling dogs, cats, and rabbits. Increasingly, these laws ban guinea pigs and other pets, too. A recent law in D.C. bans the sale of mammals, reptiles, amphibians, and birds. 

Advocates claim these laws help pets, but it’s the opposite: They actually hurt pets.

Here’s how these laws hurt pets:

Better Solutions

People are rightly seeking to ensure the welfare of animals sold through stores. The way to do this is to address animal welfare directly. Banning stores from selling animals only creates a black market where there is less protection for animals. After all, Prohibition didn’t stop moonshiners–it helped them. 

Effective solutions include:

Ready To Help?

Tell your legislators to oppose pet bans!