Animal rights activists are pressuring local governments across California to restrict or eliminate pet sales at licensed pet stores, and San Francisco is a major target.

These proposals could impact the sale of fish, birds, reptiles, and small mammals.

Similar restrictions adopted in other jurisdictions have not ended demand for pets. Instead, they have pushed consumers toward less regulated sources, including online marketplaces and out-of-state sellers where transparency and oversight are limited. Restricting responsible retailers may also encourage unsafe and unregulated “black market” pet sales.

Responsible pet stores provide consumers with a regulated and transparent place to purchase pets while offering education, guidance, and accountability. These businesses operate under existing state and local regulations designed to protect both animals and consumers.

San Francisco should focus on practical animal welfare solutions and responsible pet ownership, not broad restrictions driven by activist pressure campaigns.

Take Action Today

Contact San Francisco officials and urge them to oppose efforts to restrict responsible retail pet sales.

What Are Pet Bans?

Pet bans don’t ban pets outright, but they make it harder to get one. Typically, these laws ban stores from selling dogs, cats, and rabbits. Increasingly, these laws ban guinea pigs and other pets, too. A recent law in D.C. bans the sale of mammals, reptiles, amphibians, and birds. 

Advocates claim these laws help pets, but it’s the opposite: They actually hurt pets.

Here’s how these laws hurt pets:

Better Solutions

People are rightly seeking to ensure the welfare of animals sold through stores. The way to do this is to address animal welfare directly. Banning stores from selling animals only creates a black market where there is less protection for animals. After all, Prohibition didn’t stop moonshiners–it helped them. 

Effective solutions include:

Ready To Help?

Tell your legislators to oppose pet bans!